Digital governance and integrity in Somalia: examining how citizens’ perceptions of E-service efficiency and government transparency shape attitudes toward corruption in post-conflict Somalia
Rattachement africain : Somalie, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
This study examines the impact of Somali citizens’ perceptions of e-service efficiency and government transparency on their attitudes toward corruption in a post-conflict setting. Utilizing theories of transparency, digital governance, and institutional accountability, this study employed a quantitative approach, using a structured questionnaire administered to 488 respondents in Mogadishu. Structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) was used to assess the relationships between variables. The findings indicate that both perceived government transparency (β = 0.507, p < 0.001) and e-service efficiency (β = 0.189, p < 0.01) significantly affect citizens’ attitudes toward corruption, with transparency exerting a more substantial influence. These results suggest that enhancing transparency and optimizing digital service delivery can promote public intolerance of corruption even in fragile state contexts. However, the 43% variance suggests that other institutional and sociopolitical factors also contribute. This study recommends prioritizing transparent governance, improving digital infrastructure, promoting digital literacy, and incorporating citizen feedback mechanisms to bolster public integrity and trust in Somalia.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Digital governance and integrity in Somalia: examining how citizens’ perceptions of E-service efficiency and government transparency shape attitudes toward corruption in post-conflict Somalia
- Date Crossref
- 04/02/2026
- Éditeur
- Informa UK Limited
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.