Characterisation of Bespoke Patient-Derived In Vitro Models of Ewing Sarcoma

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background/Objectives: Preclinical models that accurately reflect Ewing sarcoma (ES) will enable the prioritisation of clinically active targeted agents from bench to clinic. To expedite this process, we have established and characterised patient-derived ES cultures (PDES) in vitro. Methods: Fluorescence in situ hybridisation, RT-PCR and western blotting were used to examine expression of the pathognomonic EWSR1 fusions. Activation or repression of EWSR1 fusion downstream targets and proliferation was examined by immunofluorescence and immunohistochemistry. Using next-generation sequencing, the DNA and transcriptomic profiles of PDES and cell lines were compared. The response of PDES and cell lines to standard-of-care chemotherapeutics, ionising radiation and investigational drugs was examined. Results: All PDES contain EWSR1 fusion DNA, consistent with a diagnosis of ES. EWSR1 fusion gene RNA and protein were detected in 70% and 21% of PDES, respectively. Markers of proliferation and expression of EWSR1 fusion target genes were consistent with the tumours from which PDES were derived (R2 = 0.74, p < 0.0001) and the paediatric mesenchymal lineage (SBS5 and SBS1, ID1 and ID2). In contrast, the transcriptome of PDES was significantly different from that of cell lines. PDES had a significantly increased doubling time (p < 0.00001), decreased expression of Ki67 (p < 0.0001) and increased migration (p < 0.02) compared to cell lines. Consistent with the longer doubling time, PDES were more resistant to doxorubicin, etoposide and vincristine and ionising radiation (p < 0.0001) than cell lines. PDES were sensitive to mTKIs (cabozantinib, lenvatinib, and regorafenib), and trabectedin. The response of PDES to drugs in vitro reflects the clinical experience of patients. Conclusions: Models incorporating PDES cells may positively contribute to the preclinical pipeline.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.