Wildfire smoke PM 2.5 and mortality rate in the contiguous United States: A causal modeling study
Rattachement africain : us, nl. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
The relationships between chronic exposure to wildfire smoke PM 2.5 (particulate matter with aerodynamic diameter of ≤2.5 μm) and mortality remain poorly understood, with causal evidence being particularly scarce. In this ecological study, we used a doubly robust method, incorporating flexible generalized propensity score estimation that captured potential nonlinearity and interactions among confounders and relaxed the distribution form assumption for exposure, to estimate the effects of annual exposure to wildfire smoke PM 2.5 on all-cause and cause-specific mortality in the contiguous United States from 2006 to 2020. We found that wildfire smoke PM 2.5 was associated with increased mortality rate for all studied outcomes, except for deaths from transport accidents or falls, which served as negative outcome controls. Wildfire smoke PM 2.5 was responsible for ~24,100 all-cause deaths per year in the contiguous United States. The exposure-response curve for all-cause mortality increased monotonically, with no evidence of a “safe” threshold. Among the six cause-specific outcomes, mortality from neurological disease showed the greatest increase per 0.1 μg/m 3 increase in smoke PM 2.5 exposure. Our study provided robust evidence for the chronic effect of wildfire smoke PM 2.5 on mortality, underscoring the urgent need for targeted measures to mitigate the substantial and escalating burden of wildfires.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- Wildfire smoke PM <sub>2.5</sub> and mortality rate in the contiguous United States: A causal modeling study
- Date Crossref
- 06/02/2026
- Éditeur
- American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.