Generating Joint Transcriptomic and Morphological Responses to Drug Perturbations via Rectified Flow
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Motivation Predicting cellular responses to drug perturbations requires capturing complex dependencies between transcriptomic and morphological changes. Existing approaches model these modalities in isolation, missing critical molecular-phenotypic relationships that occur simultaneously during drug treatment. No current method jointly predicts gene expression profiles and cellular morphology from chemical perturbations. Results We introduce PertFlow, a unified computational frame-work that simultaneously predicts treatment gene expression (bulk RNA-seq) and generates cellular morphology (Cell Painting images) from control cellular states, conditioned on drug metadata. Evaluated on paired RNA-seq and imaging data from 3 cell lines and 40 compounds (17,242 samples), PertFlow achieves Pearson correlation of 0.780±0.264 for transcriptomic prediction and FID of 24.06 for morphological generation. Board-certified pathologists rated generated images with median similarity scores of 7.11-7.89/10. The model successfully recovers known drug mechanisms including microtubule disruption, DNA damage, and MAPK pathway inhibition, with gene enrichment analysis confirming activation of expected biological pathways (EMT, p53, apoptosis). Availability Code and pretrained models will be available at https://github.com/wangmengbo/PertFlow .
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Generating Joint Transcriptomic and Morphological Responses to Drug Perturbations via Rectified Flow
- Date Crossref
- 03/02/2026
- Éditeur
- openRxiv
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.