Body-segment coordination as a new predictor of freezing of gait in people with Parkinson’s disease
Rattachement africain : fr. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Freezing of gait (FOG) in Parkinson’s disease (PD) involves impaired integration of posture and locomotion with altered body-segment coordination. We measured coordination using gait kinematics during walking in 16 PD patients with FOG, preoperatively with and without dopaminergic medication (OFF/ON-DOPA), and postoperatively with and without subthalamic deep brain stimulation (OFF/ON-DBS). Body-segment coordination was modeled from acceleration-based intersegmental correlations across trunk, pelvis, and limbs. We tested whether coordination metrics predict individual postoperative FOG severity using LASSO regression with nested cross-validation, including preoperative demographics, clinical scores, gait and coordination metrics. Preoperatively, DOPA decreased trunk-pelvis-upper-limb coordination but increased crossed upper-lower-limbs coupling; while STN-DBS selectively increased inter-upper-limb coordination, with DOPA- and STN-DBS-induced changes being correlated. Whole-body coordination predicted individual postoperative FOG severity, with the most important couplings being the trunk-pelvis and pelvis-lower-limb. Body-segment coordination captures clinically relevant gait metrics in PD, highlighting coordination as a potential biomarker for patient stratification and treatment response.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Body-segment coordination as a new predictor of freezing of gait in people with Parkinson’s disease
- Date Crossref
- 03/02/2026
- Éditeur
- openRxiv
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.