Accessing the Pancreatobiliary System via Lumen‐Apposing Metal Stents: A State‐of‐the‐Art Review of Endoscopic Ultrasound‐Directed Interventions
Rattachement africain : it, be, fr, nl, us, es, sg. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
The growing number of bariatric and oncologic gastrointestinal and hepatopancreatobiliary surgeries has fueled the increased need for biliary interventions in patients with surgically altered anatomy (SAA), where standard endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is often unfeasible. Traditional alternative methods, such as enteroscopy- or laparoscopy-assisted ERCP, are associated with technical and logistical limitations. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-directed ERCP uses lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) to create temporary anastomoses between adjacent lumens, thus restoring access for standard ERCP. These procedures include EUS-directed transgastric (EDGE), transenteric (EDEE), transduodenal (EDDE), and transcholedochal/transcystic (EDCE) ERCP. This review provides an evidence-based analysis of the available techniques and comparative outcomes, with a particular focus on technical and strategic aspects including: (1) how to create an EUS-guided anastomosis across different surgical scenarios; (2) how to perform a through-the-LAMS ERCP, including endoscope and accessory selection, ERCP timing and LAMS fixation; and (3) how to manage the fistula after completion of therapy, including timing of LAMS removal and fistula closure. An algorithm is proposed to guide the endoscopist through the complex decision-making inherent to pancreatobiliary interventions in SAA.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Accessing the Pancreatobiliary System via Lumen‐Apposing Metal Stents: A State‐of‐the‐Art Review of Endoscopic Ultrasound‐Directed Interventions
- Date Crossref
- 01/02/2026
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.