High on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity among diabetic female patients with acute ischaemic stroke
Rattachement africain : id, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Studies suggest that diabetes-related thrombotic risk differs by sex. This raises the question of whether this sex-based disparity influences the effectiveness of antithrombotic therapy. Herein, we aimed to investigate the association between sex, diabetes mellitus, and on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity in acute ischaemic stroke patients. This cross-sectional analysis used baseline data from a single-center cohort study where we recruited 650 adults diagnosed with acute ischaemic stroke receiving a 300 mg loading dose of clopidogrel from October 2022 to April 2024. Platelet reactivity was measured using the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay. The analysis was conducted using a multivariable linear regression model with an interaction term between sex and diabetes status. The overall mean platelet reactivity unit (PRU) in our study population was 168.3 ± 61.1 and was significantly higher among diabetic patients (177 ± 60 vs. 162 ± 61, p = 0.004). In our model, neither sex nor diabetes alone were significantly associated with PRU. However, the interaction between female sex and diabetes was associated with a significant increase in PRU by 20 units (95% CI: 3.0 to 37, p = 0.021). Cumulatively, diabetic female patients exhibited a PRU increase of 27.3 units compared to non-diabetic male patients, highlighting a subgroup that may require further clinical assessment.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- High on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity among diabetic female patients with acute ischaemic stroke
- Date Crossref
- 30/01/2026
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.