Ten-year 15 N labeling reveals the nitrogen retention threshold for maximizing carbon sequestration in a temperate forest
Résumé fourni par la source
Anthropogenic nitrogen (N) deposition comprising reduced (NH x ) and oxidized (NO y ) forms, differentially influences ecosystem processes. However, their long-term fates and collective impacts on ecosystem nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) and carbon (C) sequestration remain unresolved. Here, using a decade-long paired labeling ( 15 NH 4 + and 15 NO 3 − ) experiment in a temperate forest, we demonstrate that initially distinct fates of different N forms converged within 2 y due to low initial loss rates prior to organic incorporation. After 10 y, overall ecosystem retention was remarkably similar (55.3 to 65.6%) for both N forms. A process -based N-cycling model was built and parameterized by our 15 N recovery data and the model predicted declining ecosystem NUE with increasing N deposition level. We further identified a deposition-induced C sequestration potential of 41.41 kg C kg −1 N under an incremental deposition of 10 kg N ha −1 y −1 , exceeding prior estimates at comparable loads. This study provides mechanistic, high-resolution temporal data critical for refining N-cycle models and reveals an optimal N deposition range (20 to 30 kg N ha −1 y −1 ) that maximizes C sequestration while minimizing environmental risks (e.g., nutrient imbalance, eutrophication) in temperate forests.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- Ten-year <sup>15</sup> N labeling reveals the nitrogen retention threshold for maximizing carbon sequestration in a temperate forest
- Date Crossref
- 29/01/2026
- Éditeur
- National Academy of Sciences
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.