Aller au contenu principal
2026 review

Abstract DP076: Thrombectomy vs Thrombolysis vs Bridging Therapy in Late-Window Stroke with Salvageable Tissue: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

0Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
16Institutions déclarées
3Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

Background: For patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke in the late therapeutic window (>4.5 hours), the optimal treatment strategy remains debated. We conducted a network meta-analysis comparing endovascular thrombectomy, thrombolysis with alteplase or tenecteplase, and best medical therapy in patients with salvageable tissue, focusing on both efficacy and safety outcomes. Methods: We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Library through July 2025, identifying RCTs enrolling adults with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion in the late window based on CT/MR perfusion imaging. A random-effects network meta-analysis compared EVT, alteplase, tenecteplase, and best medical therapy. Primary outcome was functional independence; secondary outcomes included severe disability/death, mortality, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. Results: Fifteen trials enrolling 4,497 patients were included. Time-to-treatment across studies was 10.05 ± 4.78 hours. EVT was associated with significantly reduced 90-day mortality compared to alteplase (OR 0.41; 95% CI 0.19–0.89) and better functional outcomes (mRS 0–2 OR 2.12; 95% CI 0.75–5.98). EVT also reduced the odds of mRS 5–6 (OR 0.42; 95% CI 0.18–1.00) and showed a numerically favorable safety profile over alteplase in sICH risk (OR 0.39; 95% CI 0.08–1.91). Compared with tenecteplase, EVT lowered mortality (OR 0.61; 95% CI 0.38–0.98) with comparable efficacy. Tenecteplase had a lower sICH risk than alteplase (OR 0.27; 95% CI 0.05–1.57). Rankograms showed EVT consistently ranked highest for efficacy and safety. Conclusion: In patients with salvageable tissue presenting in the late window, EVT provides superior efficacy and safety compared to thrombolysis or medical therapy alone. Tenecteplase may offer safety advantages over alteplase. These findings support prioritizing EVT access and rapid imaging in late-presenting stroke.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Abstract DP076: Thrombectomy vs Thrombolysis vs Bridging Therapy in Late-Window Stroke with Salvageable Tissue: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Date Crossref
01/02/2026
Éditeur
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

Acute Ischemic Stroke ManagementIntracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and ComplicationsIntracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref et Europe PMC, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune réponse conservée. Sources et limites.