Diagnostic potential of cryptic exon-derived peptides in serum extracellular vesicles for sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
Rattachement africain : jp. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a neurodegenerative disease characterized by progressive degeneration and loss of upper and lower motor neurons, with approximately 90% of cases being sporadic (sporadic ALS, SALS). A reliable diagnostic biomarker remains an unmet clinical need in SALS, with misdiagnosis and diagnostic delay hindering early management. The mislocalization of the RNA-binding protein TDP-43 (encoded by TARDBP), a pathological hallmark of SALS, could lead to aberrant splicing that produces transcripts with cryptic exons and, consequently, cryptic peptides. This study proposes cryptic peptides in serum extracellular vesicles as a novel candidate diagnostic biomarker of SALS. We included 10 healthy controls and 20 patients with SALS and quantified cryptic peptides predicted from cryptic exon sequences using mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Cryptic peptides from four proteins (RANBP1, IGLON5, ACTN1, ALPK2) were detected in participants, with the IGLON5 cryptic peptide detected significantly more frequently in SALS than in HC (adjusted P = 0.044). The number of detected cryptic peptides classified SALS and healthy controls with acceptable performance (area under the curve = 0.82). In conclusion, cryptic peptides could have diagnostic performance for SALS, warranting further validation.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Diagnostic potential of cryptic exon-derived peptides in serum extracellular vesicles for sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
- Date Crossref
- 29/01/2026
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.