Evidence of a genomic basis for growth rate variation in a natural kelp population
Rattachement africain : au, no. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Understanding the genetic architecture of functional traits can provide key insights into the ecological dynamics and adaptive potential of species. We investigated whether genetic data can predict growth rate variation in a natural population of the widespread kelp, Ecklonia radiata . We tagged kelps and tracked their growth in situ over spring when growth is maximal. Individual kelps were then genotyped using reduced representation sequencing (ddRAD) and we employed multiple approaches to assess whether genetic variation corresponded with growth rate variation. Despite a limited sample size, we found evidence that growth rate can be strongly predicted from genetic variation, with approximately half of the variation in growth rate predicted by only 18 loci (R 2 = 0.499). Leveraging published transcriptomic data, we confirm that most of these loci are expressed or are linked to expressed putative genes. However, many of these genes are of unknown function and do not match well-known gene families. These findings have important implications for understanding natural kelp forest dynamics and for applied approaches such as selective breeding and aquaculture. While our study offers an important first assessment of the possible genomic architecture underlying growth rate in E. radiata , future work is needed to confirm this apparent link between genetic and functional variation.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Evidence of a genomic basis for growth rate variation in a natural kelp population
- Date Crossref
- 29/01/2026
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.