Aller au contenu principal
2026 conference-abstract

Abstract WP192: Mobile Stroke Unit Simulation Builds Systems Confidence and Competence in Stroke Trainees

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
2Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Introduction: Mobile Stroke Units (MSUs) provide unique opportunities for prehospital acute stroke care, yet exposure during training remains limited. Simulation-based education may bridge this gap by preparing stroke trainees to manage real-time diagnostic and therapeutic challenges in the field. Objective: To evaluate the impact of MSU simulation on stroke trainees’ confidence in clinical decision-making and systems navigation, and to assess their post-simulation performance in comparison with graduating trainees. Methods: A structured MSU simulation curriculum was administered to 4 new vascular neurology trainees. Confidence across 12 skill domains, including clinical decision-making and systems coordination, was assessed pre- and post-simulation using Likert-scale surveys. Pre- vs. post-simulation changes were analyzed using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and effect sizes (Cohen’s d). Post-simulation performance was then compared with 4 graduating trainees using Mann-Whitney U tests. Results: The trainees’ systems confidence post-simulation was significantly higher than pre-simulation (mean summed score 17.5 (2.4) vs 10.0 (1.2), d =4.01, 95% CI [1.4, 6.6]). The simulation showed a strong positive effect on clinical confidence (mean summed score 36.5 (3.1) vs 29.5 (4.9), d=1.7, 95% CI [–0.02, 3.3]). Key skill improvements included telemedicine utilization (mean Likert-scale score 4.3 (1) vs 2.0 (0.0)), coordination with crew (mean Likert-scale score 4.3 (0.5) vs 2.8 (0.5)), and escalation of concerns (mean Likert-scale score 4.5 (0.6) vs 2.5 (0.6)). There were minimal differences between post-simulation and graduating trainees across clinical and systems domains (mean summed score; clinical confidence: 36.5 (3.1) vs. 39.3 (1.0), d=1.2, 95% CI [-0.4, 2.7].; systems confidence: 17.5 (2.4) vs. 18.3 (1.3), d=0.4, 95% CI [–1.0, 1.8]). Conclusion: MSU simulation markedly enhanced systems-based confidence and clinical readiness among stroke trainees. Following the simulation, new stroke trainees achieved performance comparable to graduating peers, underscoring the simulation as a powerful tool to accelerate MSU competency and ensure preparedness for real-world prehospital stroke care.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Abstract WP192: Mobile Stroke Unit Simulation Builds Systems Confidence and Competence in Stroke Trainees
Date Crossref
01/02/2026
Éditeur
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Simulation-Based Education in HealthcareAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementVirtual Reality Applications and Impacts

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.