Designing for the Past in a Nonstationary Climate: Evidence from Cyclone Ditwah’s Extreme Rainfall in Sri Lanka
Rattachement africain : lk. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
The November 2025 extreme rainfall event associated with Tropical Cyclone Ditwah caused catastrophic flooding and landslides across Sri Lanka. This study presents a national-scale statistical and Intensity–Duration–Frequency (IDF)-based assessment of the event using long-term rain gauge observations, extreme value analysis, and climate scenario-based projections. The 24-h rainfall data from 46 stations were analyzed for 1-, 2-, and 3-day durations. Historical annual maximum series were extracted and compared with the 2025 event to identify record-breaking extremes. Rainfall volumes were also estimated and compared with the island’s Average Annual Rainfall (AAR) and volumes from major flood events in 2010 and 2016. The November 2025 event exceeded historical maxima at 14 stations, with estimated return periods frequently surpassing 1000 years. The cumulative rainfall volume from 26–28 November accounted for 15.8% of Sri Lanka’s AAR. Updated IDF curves incorporating the event showed marked upward shifts, with intensities at some locations matching or exceeding projections under high-emission climate scenarios. The results highlight the inadequacy of existing design standards in capturing emerging extremes and the need for urgent updates to Sri Lanka’s national IDF relationships to support climate-resilient flood risk management and infrastructure planning.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Designing for the Past in a Nonstationary Climate: Evidence from Cyclone Ditwah’s Extreme Rainfall in Sri Lanka
- Date Crossref
- 28/01/2026
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.