Time-dependent size stability and shell behaviors of lipid-coated microbubbles
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Microbubbles are excellent contrast-enhancing agents for ultrasound imaging. A long shelf life with a robust size distribution is critical for their efficacy. Here, we investigated the long-term stability and attenuation of a custom-made polydisperse microbubble suspension. The microbubbles were prepared using mechanical agitation with a gas core of perfluorobutane (C4F10), and a 9:1 molar ratio mixture of 1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphatidylcholine (DPPC) and 1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero3-phosphatidylethanolamine-polyethyleneglycol-2000 (DPPE-PEG2000) lipids. Their size distribution and attenuation response were measured in regular intervals over 30 days. The size remained the same (∼2.25 μm) for the first 13 days before slightly increasing to ∼2.5 μm. The microbubble concentration decreased with time (7.14 ± 1.12 × 109 MB/mL initially and 3.29 ± 0.66 × 109 MB/mL at day 30), resulting in a corresponding decrease in attenuation. We determined the shell properties of microbubbles by applying the exponential elasticity model (EEM) to the attenuation. Like the size, the shell elasticity and viscosity remained unchanged for 13 days and then increased by ∼50% and ∼200%, respectively. The study sheds light on the shelf life and in vitro stability of lipid-coated microbubbles, offering valuable information about their effectiveness as ultrasound contrast agents.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Time-dependent size stability and shell behaviors of lipid-coated microbubbles
- Date Crossref
- 01/01/2026
- Éditeur
- Acoustical Society of America (ASA)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.