Assessing Vulnerable and Antagonistic Traits Using the Five-Factor Model Measures
Résumé fourni par la source
In this preregistered study, we evaluated whether the Five-Factor Model Antagonistic Triad Measure (FFM ATM) can adequately capture both traditional and vulnerable expressions of socially aversive (“Dark Triad”) personality traits. In a sample of 326 university students aged 18 to 24 (M = 18.39, SD = 0.85), we administered the FFM ATM, the Five-Factor Borderline Inventory–Super Short Form (FFBI-SSF), the Levenson Self-Report Psychopathy Scale, the Hypersensitive Narcissism Scale, the McLean Screening Instrument for Borderline Personality Disorder, and the Short Dark Triad. The FFM ATM accounted for a substantial portion of the variance in the traditional Dark Triad constructs, as well as secondary psychopathy and vulnerable narcissism, but was less successful in relation to borderline personality disorder (BPD) traits. Incremental validity analyses revealed that supplementing the FFM ATM with items from the FFBI-SSF significantly enhanced the prediction of BPD traits. Exploratory factor analysis further indicated that integrating FFBI-SSF items produced a distinct BPD-like factor that extends beyond the core dimensions of antagonism, impulsivity, emotional stability, and agency. These findings suggest that the FFM ATM provides a parsimonious framework for assessing antagonistic and most vulnerable Dark Triad traits, but additional targeted measures can aid in the prediction of BPD traits.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Assessing Vulnerable and Antagonistic Traits Using the Five-Factor Model Measures
- Date Crossref
- 28/01/2026
- Éditeur
- Informa UK Limited
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.