Biomarkers in patients with clinical signs of mild cognitive impairment or mild Alzheimer's disease but without amyloid deposits on positron emission tomography: Results from Bio‐Hermes Study participants
Résumé fourni par la source
INTRODUCTION: Alzheimer's disease (AD) study participants may present with cognitive impairment who do not have brain amyloid deposits (Aβ-). Identifying predictive biomarkers for non-amyloid-related CI may provide better screening tests for trials seeking only CI Aβ+ participants and new therapy targets. METHODS: Analysis of the Bio-Hermes biomarker database identified subpopulations of clinically normal, CN Aβ- (n = 313), CI Aβ- (n = 296), and CI Aβ+ (n = 258), and CN Aβ+ (n = 84) participants. Comparative analysis of demographics, clinical assessments, biomarkers, cytokines, and proteomics results was conducted. RESULTS: Subgroup comparison of CI Aβ- versus CN Aβ- found that neurofilament light most clearly differentiated CI Aβ- from CN Aβ- participants. No other biomarker analysis reached a level of differential significance. DISCUSSION: Analyses showed many novel biomarkers do not differentiate CI Aβ- from CN Aβ-. New biomarkers are needed to best determine the neuropathology of the clinical presentation of AD. HIGHLIGHTS: NfL differentiated CN Aβ- versus cognitively impaired Aβ-. Proteomics (two platforms) did not differentially assess cognitively impaired Aβ--. Many novel biomarkers did not differentially assess cognitively impaired Aβ-. New biomarkers are needed to determine the neuropathology of AD clinical presentation.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Biomarkers in patients with clinical signs of mild cognitive impairment or mild Alzheimer's disease but without amyloid deposits on positron emission tomography: Results from Bio‐Hermes Study participants
- Date Crossref
- 01/01/2026
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.