Form, Function and Feeding: Changes in Tooth Size and Shape Associated With Ontogenetic Changes in Prey Consumption by Australian White Sharks ( Carcharodon carcharias )

Le résumé fourni par la source

ABSTRACT White sharks undergo pronounced ecological and dietary shifts across ontogeny, and their teeth play a central role in mediating these changes. Understanding the complexity within shark tooth and jaw mechanics, plus the fine‐scale tooth morphology, can provide insights into how feeding strategies and, hence, dietary niches and ecological function evolve with age and size. These morphological changes underpin ontogenetic niche shifts, revealing how functional adaptations in dentition enable white sharks to exploit different prey resources throughout development. This study provides novel insights into the ontogenetic and positional variation in C. carcharias dentition, integrating both Elliptic Fourier Analysis (EFA) and traditional morphometric approaches. We reveal significant patterns of tooth morphology that vary with jaw position and ontogenetic stage, reflecting functional adaptations to changing dietary and biomechanical demands. A key ontogenetic shift was identified as teeth transitioned from narrow, cuspidate forms with accessory cusplets in juveniles to broader, serrated teeth in larger individuals. We found no significant differences in tooth morphology between sexes, aligning with known similarities in diet and body shape in the eastern Australian white shark population. Significant anterior‐to‐posterior variation in tooth form was observed within the jaw, with lateral teeth becoming more compressed and recurved, suggesting functional transitions in prey handling throughout the jaw. Additionally, we documented structural changes in jaw morphology at approximately 210 cm PCL, corresponding to broader teeth and increased bite capacity. These shifts likely reflect developmental milestones in feeding capability, supporting the transition from a solely piscivorous diet to the inclusion of marine mammal prey.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.