Action-based Mentoring in Scientific Writing (AMSW) for nurse researchers: A concept analysis

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Mentorship is crucial for enhancing research productivity and scholarly development in research publications among nurse researchers. Despite its importance, the concept of action-based mentoring in scientific writing (AMSW) is not clearly defined, leading to inconsistent mentorship practices and limited research dissemination in nursing. AIM: This review aimed to analyse the concept of AMSW to provide a clear understanding, define its characteristics, and explore its implications for improving scientific writing skills and research dissemination among nurse researchers. METHODS: Walker and Avant's eight-step method of concept analysis was used. DATA SOURCES: Five databases were searched (PubMed, Scopus, ProQuest, CINAHL and Ovid Medline), and 14 articles were identified for analysis. The selected studies explored mentorship strategies, writing programs, collaborative writing, and the impact of mentorship on research productivity. RESULTS: Five defining attributes of AMSW were identified: collaborative learning, interactive guidance, skill development, structured support, and outcome orientation. The antecedents included limited writing experience, a lack of confidence in scholarly writing, and barriers such as time constraints and inadequate mentorship. The consequences of effective AMSW included enhanced writing skills, increased research productivity, successful publications, and strengthened research networks. Empirical referents, such as publication output, research productivity, improved writing skills, professional development, and mentee satisfaction, provide a basis for measuring the impact of AMSW. CONCLUSION: The findings highlight that AMSW effectively addresses nurses' scholarly writing and publication challenges. The application of AMSW can enhance mentorship practices, promote research dissemination, and empower nurse researchers to contribute effectively.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.