Neural Network Architectures in Video Capsule Endoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Accuracy and Reading Time Performances
Rattachement africain : it. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Artificial intelligence (AI) has revolutionized medical image analysis. Several neural network (NN) architectures were developed and applied across the last decade, becoming essential for automated diagnosis and clinical applications. AI based on NNs has become increasingly integrated into gastroenterology, offering new opportunities for automated lesion detection and workflow optimization. Small-bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) has benefited substantially from these advances, addressing long-standing challenges such as time-consuming video review and variability among readers. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated neural network-based models for lesion detection in SBCE, assessing pooled diagnostic accuracy and the impact of AI on reading time. A total of 44 primary studies were included: 36 validation studies for accuracy and 9 clinical studies for reading time. All NN architectures demonstrated high diagnostic performance, with a pooled accuracy of 95.3% (95% CI: 94.1–96.5%). More recent architectures, including transformer-based and capsule networks, outperformed classical convolutional neural networks (CNNs). AI assistance significantly reduced SBCE reading time, with a pooled mean reduction of 84% compared to standard review. These findings highlight the strong potential of AI to enhance SBCE efficiency and diagnostic reliability.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Neural Network Architectures in Video Capsule Endoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Accuracy and Reading Time Performances
- Date Crossref
- 22/01/2026
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.