Grey Wolf Optimization-Optimized Ensemble Models for Predicting the Uniaxial Compressive Strength of Rocks

Résumé fourni par la source

Reliable models for predicting the uniaxial compressive strength (UCS) of rocks are crucial for mining operations and rock engineering design. Empirical methods, including statistical methods, are often faced with many limitations when generalizing in a wide range of lithological types. To address this limitation, this study investigates the capability of grey wolf optimization (GWO)-optimized ensemble machine learning models, including decision tree (DT), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), and adaptive boosting (AdaBoost) for predicting UCS using a small dataset of easily measurable and non-destructive rock index properties. The study’s objective is to evaluate whether metaheuristic-based hyperparameter optimization can enhance model robustness and generalization performance under small-sample conditions. A unified experimental framework incorporating GWO-based optimization, three-fold cross-validation, sensitivity analysis, and multiple statistical performance indicators was implemented. The findings of this study confirm that although the GWO-XGBoost model achieves the highest training accuracy, it exhibits signs of mild overfitting. In contrast, the GWO-AdaBoost model outpaced with significant improvement in terms of coefficient of determination (R2) = 0.993, root mean square error (RMSE) = 2.2830, mean absolute error (MAE) = 1.6853, and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) = 4.6974. Therefore, the GWO-AdaBoost has proven to be the most effective in terms of its prediction potential of UCS, with significant potential for adaptation due to its effectively learned parameters. From a theoretical perspective, this study highlights the non-equivalence between training accuracy and predictive reliability in UCS modeling. Practically, the findings support the use of GWO-AdaBoost as a reliable decision-support tool for preliminary rock strength assessment in mining and geotechnical engineering, particularly when comprehensive laboratory testing is not feasible.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.