Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 review

Effectiveness of nonpharmacological interventions on pain reduction among patients undergoing colonoscopy without anesthesia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
1Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Pain is the most prominent physical discomfort during colonoscopy without anesthesia and an important factor affecting patients' adherence to screening guidelines of colorectal cancer. However, the optimal nonpharmacological analgesic strategy for colonoscopy without anesthesia remains unclear. This network meta-analysis (NMA) aims to synthesize and rank the effectiveness of existing nonpharmacological interventions for pain reduction to identify the most effective approach. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, CINAHL Plus, and CENTRAL were systematically searched from their inception to March, 2025. Randomized controlled trials reporting the use of nonpharmacological interventions during colonoscopy without anesthesia were included. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) based on random-effects model was calculated to estimate the effect sizes. The methodological quality of the included studies was appraised using the Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for Randomized Trials 2.0. NMA was performed within a frequentist framework using the STATA software v17.0. RESULTS: A total of 28 RCTs involving 3543 participants were included in this review, encompassing 10 nonpharmacological interventions and 2 control conditions. The result of NMA indicated that, virtual reality (VR), audiovisual distraction, visual distraction, abdominal corset, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, and music listening significantly reduced pain during colonoscopy without anesthesia compared with passive control (SMDs: -0.85 to -0.50) and corresponding placebo (SMDs: -0.99 to -0.65). The results of SUCRA suggested that VR may be the most effective nonpharmacological intervention (86.3%), followed by audiovisual distraction (81.5%), abdominal corset (72.3%), and visual distraction (68.7%). In contrast, the stress ball demonstrated the least effectiveness (16.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Attention distraction techniques may represent the most effective nonpharmacological strategies for pain reduction. However, the limited number of studies for some interventions may introduce potential risks of bias in the present analysis. Further research is needed to supplement the findings of our study to provide reliable evidence-based evidence for non-pharmacological analgesia during colonoscopy without anesthesia.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Effectiveness of nonpharmacological interventions on pain reduction among patients undergoing colonoscopy without anesthesia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Date Crossref
23/01/2026
Éditeur
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Music Therapy and HealthAnesthesia and Sedative AgentsPediatric Pain Management Techniques

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.