Trophic ecology and stable isotope niche space of tuna, billfishes and sharks in New Zealand waters
Résumé fourni par la source
Context Highly migratory species (HMS), such as tuna, billfishes and sharks, are a major component of the top predator guild in oceanic ecosystems, but the trophic relationships of many populations remain poorly understood. Aims This study aimed to characterise the trophic ecology and habitat use of 10 HMS collected from two subtropical oceanic regions around Aotearoa–New Zealand. Methods We examined stable isotope ratios (δ13C and δ15N) in muscle tissue of HMS considering differences in capture location and body size. Key results Three trophic groups were distinguished: (1) swordfish, (2) tuna and Lamna nasus (porbeagle) in northern New Zealand and (3) marlins and other pelagic sharks. Despite stable isotope overlap among taxonomically similar species, subtle differences in foraging strategies likely contribute to variation in ecological roles. Trophic position estimates revealed that HMS occupy high trophic levels, though these estimates may be influenced by variations in δ15N baseline. Stable isotope analysis indicated consistent trophic relationships across the two investigated oceanic regions, with evidence of ontogenetic shifts in resources use in some species. Conclusions Stable isotope ratios varied widely among HMS, suggesting exploitation of diverse foraging habitats and extensive migration. Implications These data highlight the diverse trophic roles of HMS and emphasise their significance in structuring marine food webs and ecosystem functioning.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Trophic ecology and stable isotope niche space of tuna, billfishes and sharks in New Zealand waters
- Date Crossref
- 12/03/2026
- Éditeur
- CSIRO Publishing
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.