HIV-1 Prevalence and Oral Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Effectiveness and Prevalence of Use Among Key Populations in High-Income Economies (2017–2023): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Real-World Studies
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
In this systematic literature review and meta-analysis, real-world data from high-income economies (excluding the US and Africa) on HIV-1 epidemiology (2019-2023), oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) effectiveness (2017-2023), and prevalence of oral PrEP use (2017-2023) were assessed in key populations disproportionately affected by HIV-1. Overall, 204 unique data sources were identified from 38 high-income economies. In key populations, the pooled global HIV-1 prevalence estimate was 5.1% (95% confidence interval: 4.2%-6.1%), ranging from 0.2% in South Korea to 28.9% in Romania. Pooled global prevalence was lowest in transgender men (1.4%) and people in prison (2.2%); 7.0%-7.8% in men who have sex with men, people who inject drugs, sex workers, and transgender women; and highest in individuals who were in multiple key populations (19.4%). Global prevalence of oral PrEP use was 18.2% among key populations, with HIV-1 prevalence <0.4% in PrEP users, indicating high PrEP effectiveness. Targeted prevention strategies are needed to provide global equitable PrEP access and reduce HIV-1 acquisition.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- HIV-1 Prevalence and Oral Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis Effectiveness and Prevalence of Use Among Key Populations in High-Income Economies (2017–2023): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Real-World Studies
- Date Crossref
- 26/12/2025
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.