COSMOS Spectroscopic Redshift Compilation (First Data Release): 488,000 Redshifts Encompassing Two Decades of Spectroscopy
Le résumé fourni par la source
We present the COSMOS Spectroscopic Redshift Compilation encompassing similar to 20 yr of spectroscopic redshifts within a 10 deg(2) area centered on the 2 deg(2) COSMOS legacy field. This compilation contains 487,666 redshifts of 266,284 unique objects from 138 individual programs up to z similar to 8 with median stellar mass similar to 10(8.4)-10(10) M-circle dot (redshift dependent). Rest-frame NUVrJ colors and star formation rate-stellar mass correlations show that the compilation primarily contains low-to-intermediate-mass star-forming and massive, quiescent galaxies at z < 1.25 and mostly low-mass bursty star-forming galaxies at z > 2. Sources in the compilation cover a diverse range of environments, including protoclusters such as "Hyperion." The full compilation is 50% spectroscopically complete by i similar to 23.4 mag and Ks similar to 21.6 mag; however, this is redshift dependent. Spatially, the compilation is >50% (>30%) complete within the central (outer) region limited to i < 24 mag and K-s < 22.5 mag, separately. We demonstrate how the compilation can be used to validate photometric redshifts and investigate calibration metrics. By training self-organizing maps on COSMOS2020/Classic and projecting the compilation onto it, we find key subpopulations currently lacking spectroscopic coverage, including z < 1 intermediate-mass quiescent and low-/intermediate-mass bursty star-forming galaxies, z similar to 2 massive quiescent galaxies, and z > 3 massive star-forming galaxies. This highlights how combining self-organizing maps with our compilation can provide guidance for future spectroscopic observations to get a complete spectroscopic view of galaxy populations. Lastly, the compilation will undergo periodic data releases incorporating new spectroscopic redshifts and providing a lasting legacy resource for the community.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.