Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

Ultrasound and SNP-based cell-free DNA zygosity testing in twin pregnancies

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
0Institutions déclarées
0Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Le résumé fourni par la source

The importance of prenatal determination of chorionicity for the management of twin pregnancies is well recognized. However, research on the contribution of prenatal evaluation of zygosity to the management of twins is limited. We assessed the utility of adding SNP-based cell-free DNA (cfDNA) zygosity testing to ultrasound chorionicity assessment for the clinical management of twin pregnancies. Prospective observational study involving 13 United States practices with proficiency in prenatal ultrasound. Patients diagnosed by ultrasound with twins in the first trimester were assessed with cfDNA screening for zygosity. Ultrasound assessment of chorionicity was performed prior to cfDNA results. Placental pathology was used as the gold standard for chorionicity assessment. Gestational age at delivery and standardized birthweights were compared, based on chorionicity and zygosity. 110 twin pregnancies were included. Among 79 dichorionic (DC) cases confirmed by placental pathology, one (1.3%) was misclassified as monochorionic (MC) by ultrasound, but was dizygous (DZ) by cfDNA, consistent with DC. Of 31 monozygotic (MZ) twins by cfDNA, confirmed as MC by pathology, ultrasound misclassified one (3.6%) as DC. Median gestational age at delivery was earlier for MZ twin pregnancies (35.0 weeks) compared to DZ (36.9 weeks, p = 0.02). After adjusting for fetal sex and gestational age at birth, MZDC twins had significantly lower birthweights (p = 0.006) and birthweight percentiles (p = 0.004) than DZDC twins. Based on postpartum placental pathology as the reference standard for determining MC versus DC, cfDNA zygosity testing appears to aid in the prenatal assignment of chorionicity. Larger studies are needed to confirm the value of zygosity testing in the management of twin pregnancies.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

La source scientifique ouverte est momentanément indisponible.

Les sujets associés

Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin PregnancyPrenatal Screening and DiagnosticsPregnancy and preeclampsia studies

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.