A cross-correction gene therapy approach for CDKL5 deficiency disorder improves the pathological phenotype of CDD patient-derived cortical organoids
Rattachement africain : it, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Efficient delivery of biological material to the central nervous system remains a key limitation of conventional gene therapies. Recently, we developed a novel strategy based on a secretable and cell-penetrating TATk-CDKL5 fused protein which enhances the brain biodistribution and the therapeutic efficiency of the gene therapy approach in a mouse model of CDKL5 Deficiency Disorder (CDD). Here, to compare the efficacy of the TATk-CDKL5 gene therapy with a conventional approach in correcting the CDKL5 Deficiency Disorder pathological phenotype, we employed cortical organoids generated from CDD patient-derived iPSCs as a human model of CDD. We found greater therapeutic efficacy of the recombinant TATk-CDKL5 protein compared to the CDKL5 protein alone in improving or ameliorating defects caused by the absence of CDKL5, such as abnormal hyperexcitability evaluated with microelectrode arrays (MEA). Interestingly, CDD cortical organoids exhibited reduced cell proliferation and increased neuronal cell death compared to control cortical organoids; defects that were only restored by the expression of the recombinant TATk-CDKL5 protein. Based on the results from phenotypic and functional readouts, these findings suggest that gene therapy using a cross-correction approach offers superior efficiency in treating CDD.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- A cross-correction gene therapy approach for CDKL5 deficiency disorder improves the pathological phenotype of CDD patient-derived cortical organoids
- Date Crossref
- 21/01/2026
- Éditeur
- Frontiers Media SA
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.