An improved YOLOv10-based framework for knee MRI lesion detection with enhanced small object recognition and low contrast feature extraction
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Rationale and objectives: To address the challenges in detecting anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) lesions in knee MRI examinations, including difficulties in identifying tiny lesions, insufficient extraction of low-contrast features, and poor modeling of irregular lesion morphologies, and to provide a precise and efficient auxiliary diagnostic tool for clinical practice. Materials and methods: An enhanced framework based on YOLOv10 is constructed. The backbone network is optimized using the C2f-SimAM module to enhance multi-scale feature extraction and spatial attention; an Adaptive Spatial Fusion (ASF) module is introduced in the neck to better fuse multi-scale spatial features; and a novel hybrid loss function combining Focal-EIoU and KPT Loss is employed. To ensure rigorous statistical evaluation, we utilized a five-fold cross-validation strategy on a dataset of 917 cases. Results: < 0.05) compared to the standard YOLOv10, and mAP@0.5:0.95 is improved by 2.5%. Qualitative analysis further confirms the model's ability to reduce false negatives in small, low-contrast tears. Conclusion: This framework effectively connects general object detection models with the specific requirements of medical imaging, providing a precise and efficient solution for diagnosing ACL injuries in routine clinical workflows.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- An improved YOLOv10-based framework for knee MRI lesion detection with enhanced small object recognition and low contrast feature extraction
- Date Crossref
- 20/01/2026
- Éditeur
- Frontiers Media SA
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.