Incidence rate of rotavirus-associated diarrhea in Pudong New Area, Shanghai, China, during the period 2018–2022
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: We aimed to estimate the incidence rate of rotavirus-associated diarrhea in Pudong New Area, Shanghai, China, from 2018 to 2022. METHODS: Data from the hospital information systems of eight sentinel hospitals and the Healthcare Utilization and Attitudes Survey were used to calculate the incidence rate of rotavirus-associated diarrhea in Monte Carlo simulation. RESULTS: The findings revealed a decline in the positivity rate of rotavirus among medically-attended patients with diarrhea, from 13.5% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 12.0–15.0) in 2018 to 5.2% (95% CI: 4.2–6.2) in 2022. The incidence rate of rotavirus-associated diarrhea decreased from 60.5 cases per 1000 person-years (95% CI: 43.4–79.4) during the period 2018–2019 to 10.3 cases per 1000 person-years (95% CI: 7.3–13.9) during the period 2020–2022. A marked decline in the incidence rate of rotavirus-associated diarrhea was observed in community-dwelling populations during the period 2020–2022, compared with the pre-pandemic period of 2018–2019. CONCLUSION: We evaluated the positivity rates of rotavirus and incidence rate of rotavirus-associated diarrhea in Pudong New Area, thereby providing valuable data to clarify the actual disease burden of rotavirus-associated diarrhea. CLINICAL TRIAL: Not applicable.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Incidence rate of rotavirus-associated diarrhea in Pudong New Area, Shanghai, China, during the period 2018–2022
- Date Crossref
- 20/01/2026
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.