Epidemiology and outcomes of children admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit in Suriname: a retrospective observational study from a middle-income country
Résumé fourni par la source
The pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) at the Academic Hospital Paramaribo (AHP), operational since 2017, is the only tertiary referral center for critically ill children in Suriname. This study aims to describe the clinical and demographic characteristics and outcomes of critically ill children treated in the PICU over 2 years, and to assess risk factors associated with mortality during PICU admission. A retrospective study of admissions from children 16 years and younger admitted to the PICU of the AHP between January 1, 2021, and December 31, 2022. During the study period, 424 PICU admissions were included, of which 91% were acute and unplanned. The most frequent medical reasons for admission were convulsions (8.5%), pneumonia/lung abscess/empyema (7.5%), and bronchiolitis (7.3%). One hundred thirty-six admissions (32.0%) received mechanical ventilation, and 104 (24.5%) required inotropes. The median PICU stay was 3 days (interquartile range 0-6), with a mortality rate of 12.0%. In the multivariate analysis, only male gender, mechanical ventilation, and inotropes were associated with increased risk of death. The results of this benchmarking study can ultimately serve as a valuable resource for policy-makers and important stakeholders in the process of improving the care provided to critically ill children in Suriname.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Epidemiology and outcomes of children admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit in Suriname: a retrospective observational study from a middle-income country
- Date Crossref
- 02/01/2026
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.