Correlation of MLASA2 Clinical Phenotype and Survival with Mt-TyrRS Protein Damage: Linking Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and 3D Hotspot Mapping
Rattachement africain : mx. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
gene (which encodes the Mt-TyrRS protein. We performed a comprehensive clinical-molecular synthesis by integrating a systematic review and meta-analysis of all published MLASA2 cases with survival modeling and three-dimensional structural mapping. Across the aggregated cohort, anemia (88.6%), sideroblastic phenotype (85.7%), and lactic acidosis (82.9%) were the most prevalent phenotypes. Fifteen PVs were identified, dominated by p.(Phe52Leu) (29.4%). Survival estimates were 94.1% at 10 years, 70.7% at 30 years, and 42.4% at 50 years; cardiomyopathy and diagnosis before age 10 were associated with decreased survival. We generated the first 3D structural map of all reported Mt-TyrRS PVs, identifying nine spatial hotspots across catalytic, anticodon-binding, and tRNA-binding domains. An integrated framework combining structural density, clinical severity, in silico predictions, and ΔΔG destabilization classified three clusters as High-risk, three as Medium-risk, and three as Low-risk. Among them, cluster 3, a large catalytic hotspot encompassing 44 residues and including nearly half of all MLASA2 cases, showed the strongest pathogenic convergence. This clinical-structural integration provides new insights for a better comprehension of MLASA2, enhancing variant interpretation and improving diagnostic and prognostic precision.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Correlation of MLASA2 Clinical Phenotype and Survival with Mt-TyrRS Protein Damage: Linking Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and 3D Hotspot Mapping
- Date Crossref
- 16/01/2026
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.