Clinical Image-Based Dosimetry of Actinium-225 in Targeted Alpha Therapy

Le résumé fourni par la source

Actinium-225 (225Ac) has emerged as a pivotal alpha-emitter in modern radiopharmaceutical therapy, offering potent cytotoxicity with the potential for precise tumour targeting. Accurate, patient-specific image-based dosimetry for 225Ac is essential to optimize therapeutic efficacy while minimizing radiation-induced toxicity. Establishing a robust dosimetry workflow is particularly challenging due to the complex decay chain, low administered activity, limited count statistics, and the indirect measurement of daughter gamma emissions. Clinical single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography protocols with harmonized acquisition parameters, combined with robust volume-of-interest segmentation, artificial intelligence (AI)-driven image processing, and voxel-level analysis, enable reliable time-activity curve generation and absorbed-dose calculation, while reduced mixed-model approaches improve workflow efficiency, reproducibility, and patient-centred implementation. Cadmium zinc telluride-based gamma cameras further enhance quantitative accuracy, enabling rapid whole-body imaging and precise activity measurement, supporting patient-friendly dosimetry. Complementing these advances, the cerium-134/lanthanum-134 positron emission tomography in vivo generator provides a unique theranostic platform to noninvasively monitor 225Ac progeny redistribution, evaluate alpha-decay recoil, and study tracer internalization, particularly for internalizing vectors. Together, these technological and methodological innovations establish a mechanistically informed framework for individualized 225Ac dosimetry in targeted alpha therapy, supporting optimized treatment planning and precise response assessment. Continued standardization and validation of imaging, reconstruction, and dosimetry workflows will be critical to translate these approaches into reproducible, patient-specific clinical care.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.