Cross national comparison of memory function before and after a cancer diagnosis in the United States and England
Rattachement africain : us, no. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVES: The long-term memory aging of middle-aged and older cancer survivors is not fully understood and is largely limited to the United States (US) context. We compared long-term memory trajectories before and after an incident cancer diagnosis with the memory trajectories of similarly aged cancer-free adults in the US and England. METHODS: Incident cancer diagnosis and memory (immediate and delayed recall) were assessed during biennial interviews in the US Health and Retirement Study (HRS; n = 13,037) and the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA; n = 8,579) from 2002 to 2018. Within country, multivariable adjusted linear mixed-effects models estimated the standardized memory trajectories in participants with and without cancer. RESULTS: Prior to diagnosis, cancer survivors had a memory advantage compared to cancer-free individuals, within each country (difference for cancer survivors in the US: 0.10 SD units [95% CI: 0.05, 0.14] and in England: 0.14 SD units [95% CI: 0.07, 0.20]). Cancer survivors in the US experienced an acute decline in memory function immediately following diagnosis (-0.08 SD units; 95% CI: -0.11, -0.04), which was not experienced by cancer survivors in England (0.01 SD units; 95% CI: -0.04, 0.07). Long-term post-diagnosis memory trajectories were similar for cancer survivors and cancer-free participants alike in both countries. CONCLUSION: The acute decline in memory function associated with a new cancer diagnosis among cancer survivors in the US, but not England, warrants future studies to investigate explanations for this cross-national difference, such as differences in healthcare systems and treatment. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Results can generate hypotheses to identify contextual risk factors to improve cognitive aging of cancer survivors.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Cross national comparison of memory function before and after a cancer diagnosis in the United States and England
- Date Crossref
- 17/01/2026
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.