Considerations of Bacterial Robustness and Stability to Improve Bioprocess Design
Résumé fourni par la source
Harnessing nature’s ingenuity with microorganisms for industrial production is an attractive solution to today’s climate concerns. Nature’s innate diversity allows the production of many value-added chemicals and can be expanded on through genetic engineering. Although the use of microbial cell factories (MCFs) has been extremely successful at lab scale, the numbers of successful bioprocesses remain limited. High cell densities and long cultivation times lead to reductions in productivity over the course of the cultivation through the effects of genetic and expression instability of the strain. This instability leads to population diversification. In this review, we explore the roots of genetic instability in microorganisms, focusing on prokaryotic bioprocesses, and how organisms cope with this instability. We spotlight single-cell detection methods capable of monitoring populations within the bioprocess both in- and on-line. We also examine different approaches to minimizing population diversification, both through strain development and bioprocess engineering. With this review, we highlight the fact that population-averaged metrics overlook the single-cell stresses driving genetic and functional instability, leading to an overestimation of microbial bioprocess robustness. High-throughput single-cell monitoring in industry-like conditions remains essential to identify and select truly stable microbial cell factories and bioprocesses.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Considerations of Bacterial Robustness and Stability to Improve Bioprocess Design
- Date Crossref
- 16/01/2026
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.