Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

Quantitative evaluation of genotoxicity data for risk assessment and regulatory decision-making: Time for a paradigm shift

1Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
13Institutions déclarées
8Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : de, nl, be, it, gb, ch, us, ca. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

• Genotoxicity assessment is a cornerstone of chemical safety assessment. • Traditionally, genotoxicity assessment focussed on hazard identification. • There is a drive towards a quantitative interpretation of genotoxicity data. • Uncertainties associated with the quantitative assessment need to be considered. • Paradigm shift requires joint efforts from all stakeholders involved. Genotoxicity plays an important role in chemical safety assessment, as genetic alterations can lead to severe and irreversible health consequences. To date, the assessment of genotoxicity has mostly been limited to hazard identification, followed by rigorous risk mitigation measures if a substance is found to be mutagenic, regardless of potency, the underlying mechanism, and cellular biology. While this regulatory hazard-based approach is straightforward, it is unsatisfactory when exposure to genotoxic substances cannot be completely avoided and/or regulatory measures lead to misperceptions of risk and undesirable socioeconomic side effects. The latter becomes particularly obvious in light of natural genotoxicants, e.g. occurring in plant-based food, and for substances that are difficult to replace but come with a high socioeconomic value but little potency and exposure. Hence, there is an increasing demand for a paradigm shift towards a quantitative interpretation of genotoxicity data in regulatory risk assessment. However, moving away from the traditional hazard-based assessment and doing so safely requires a collective effort of all relevant stakeholders. To this end, the German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR) organised an international symposium, at which experts from regulatory authorities, academia and industry discussed the opportunities and challenges involved. Here, we present key issues to be considered for a successful implementation of quantitative approaches. In situations where exposure to genotoxic substances cannot be completely avoided, e.g. occurrence of contaminants, quantitative approaches offer the opportunity to better characterise the associated risks and thus enable risk managers to make more informed decisions.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Quantitative evaluation of genotoxicity data for risk assessment and regulatory decision-making: Time for a paradigm shift
Date Crossref
01/02/2026
Éditeur
Elsevier BV
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Carcinogens and Genotoxicity AssessmentEffects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicalsEffects of Radiation Exposure

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.