Segmentation and calculation of lung fibrosis in IPF mice by 2.5D UNet
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis significantly threatens patient survival and remains a condition with limited effective treatment options. There is an urgent need to expedite the exploration of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis mechanisms and identify suitable therapeutic approaches. Non-invasive and rapid segmentation of lung tissue, coupled with fibrosis quantification, is essential for drug development and efficacy monitoring. In this study, 59 mice were divided into training, validation and test sets according to the ratio of 70%:15%:15%. Based on this ratio, we performed a six-fold cross-validation to ensure the reliability of our results and calculated the average performance across all test sets. At first, a 2.5D UNet was utilized to segment the lung tissue of mice, followed by the calculation of a fibrosis score based on the segmented output, which can be used to evaluate the degree of pulmonary fibrosis in mice. Dice score, precision and recall are used to evaluated the performance of 2.5D UNet. In the test set, the 2.5D UNet achieved an average Dice score of 0.938, precision of 0.941, and recall of 0.936 across the six-fold cross-validation. The fibrosis score effectively demonstrated the varying impacts of different modeling or treatment methods. The 2.5D UNet can effectively segment mice lung tissue and evaluate fibrosis scores, which lays a solid foundation for further research.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Segmentation and calculation of lung fibrosis in IPF mice by 2.5D UNet
- Date Crossref
- 01/02/2026
- Éditeur
- IOP Publishing
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.