Dual-modality, deep-learning-enabled endomicroscope with large field-of-view and depth-of-field for real-time in vivo imaging of epithelial hallmarks of cancer
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract In vivo microscopy (IVM) has shown great promise to improve early detection of epithelial precancer, but it suffers from fundamental trade-offs that limit the resolution, field-of-view (FOV) and depth-of-field (DOF). Here, we present PrecisionView, a compact, deep-learning-enabled endomicroscope that breaks these constrains and achieves 20 mm 2 FOV and 500 µm DOF with 4 µm resolution, representing approximately 5× increase in FOV and 8× larger DOF compared to conventional IVM with similar resolution. PrecisionView integrates a deep-learning optimized phase mask and real-time reconstruction, enabling rapid in vivo assessment of two key hallmarks of cancer: epithelial cell nuclear morphology and subsurface microvasculature through fluorescence and reflectance imaging. By imaging oral cavity of healthy volunteers and cervical specimens with precancerous lesions, PrecisionView generates large-scale (1-3 cm 2 ) co-registered maps of cellular and vascular structures, revealing distinct microscopic patterns associated with anatomic structures and precancerous lesions. Our results suggest the potential of this computational endomicroscope to address the unmet need for early cancer detection at the point-of-care.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Dual-modality, deep-learning-enabled endomicroscope with large field-of-view and depth-of-field for real-time in vivo imaging of epithelial hallmarks of cancer
- Date Crossref
- 15/01/2026
- Éditeur
- openRxiv
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.