Patient-reported outcomes after upper-extremity deep vein thrombosis due to compression syndromes: a multinational longitudinal retrospective study
Résumé fourni par la source
Background: There are limited data on functional and patient-reported outcomes after acute upper-extremity deep vein thrombosis (UEDVT) caused by compression syndromes. Objectives: This study examined patient-reported functional impairment, quality of life, and treatment satisfaction after UEDVT. Methods: We did a retrospective multicenter cohort study of patients with confirmed UEDVT due to compression syndromes not related to central lines. Patients were included at 5 centers in 4 countries and completed a standardized patient-reported outcome survey. The primary outcome was upper-limb function measured via the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) score (range, 0-100; higher scores indicate worse function) during follow-up. Quality of life was assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale. Additional outcomes included persistent symptoms, treatment satisfaction, mental health impact, and perception of unmet needs. Results: < .001) and across QuickDASH items and countries. Symptom persistence emerged as the main predictor of residual functional impairment. Patient-reported priorities included maintaining adequate arm function (78%) and avoiding recurrent UEDVT (73%). Conclusion: UEDVT can have lasting functional and psychosocial effects. Patient-reported outcomes reveal a burden that is not captured by traditional clinical metrics and should be integrated into routine care as well in the setting of interventional trials.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Patient-reported outcomes after upper-extremity deep vein thrombosis due to compression syndromes: a multinational longitudinal retrospective study
- Date Crossref
- 01/01/2026
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.