Sensor-Derived Trunk Stability and Gait Recovery: Evidence of Neuromechanical Associations Following Intensive Robotic Rehabilitation
Résumé fourni par la source
This quantitative observational study with pre–post design aimed to examine joint-specific kinematic adaptations and the relationship between trunk stability and spatiotemporal gait parameters following intensive robotic rehabilitation. A total of 12 neurological patients completed 16 sessions of gait training using the Tecnobody Smart Gravity Walker. Pre- and post-training kinematic data were collected for bilateral hip and knee flexion–extension, trunk flexion–extension, trunk lateral flexion, and center-of-gravity displacement. Waveforms were normalized to 100% stride. Paired t-tests assessed pre–post differences, and correlations examined associations between trunk stability and gait performance. Significant increases were found in right hip flexion–extension (t = 3.44, p < 0.001), trunk flexion–extension (t = 9.49, p < 0.001), and center-of-gravity displacement (t = 15.15, p < 0.001), with reduced trunk lateral flexion (t = –8.64, p < 0.001). Trunk flexion–extension correlated with gait speed (r = 0.74), step length (r = 0.68), and stride length (r = 0.71); trunk lateral flexion correlated with cadence (r = 0.66) and stride length (r = 0.70). Intensive robotic rehabilitation improved trunk and hip kinematics, supporting trunk stability as an important biomechanical correlate of gait recovery. Sensor-derived metrics revealed strong neuromechanical coupling between postural control and locomotion in neurological patients.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Sensor-Derived Trunk Stability and Gait Recovery: Evidence of Neuromechanical Associations Following Intensive Robotic Rehabilitation
- Date Crossref
- 15/01/2026
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.