Accès ouvert déclaré
2026
article
The NANOGrav 15 yr Dataset: Targeted Searches for Supermassive Black Hole Binaries
Nikita Agarwal, Gabriella Agazie, Akash Anumarlapudi, Anne M. Archibald, Zaven Arzoumanian, J. G. Baier, P. T. Baker, Bence Becsy, Laura Blecha, Adam Brazier, Paul R. Brook, Sarah Burke-Spolaor, Rand Burnette, Robin Case, J. Andrew Casey-Clyde, Yu-Ting Chang, Maria Charisi, Shami Chatterjee, Tyler Cohen, Paolo Coppi, James M. Cordes, Neil J. Cornish, Fronefield Crawford, H. Thankful Cromartie, Kathryn Crowter, Megan DeCesar, Paul B. Demorest, Heling Deng, Lankeswar Dey, Timothy Dolch, Daniel J. D'Orazio, E Eisenberg, Elizabeth C. Ferrara, Graham Doskoch, William Fiore, Emmanuel Fonseca, Gabriel E. Freedman, Emiko C. Gardiner, N. Garver-Daniels, Peter A. Gentile, Kyle A. Gersbach, Joseph Glaser, M. J. Graham, Deborah C. Good, Kayhan Gültekin, Christopher J. Harris, Jeffrey S. Hazboun, Forrest Hutchison, Ross J. Jennings, Aaron D. Johnson, Megan L. Jones, D. L. Kaplan, Luke Zoltan Kelley, M. Kerr, J. S. Key, Nima Laal, William G. Lamb, Bjorn Larsen, T. Joseph W. Lazio, N. Lewandowska, Tingting Liu, D. R. Lorimer, Jing Luo, Ryan S. Lynch, Chung-Pei Ma, Dustin R. Madison, Cayenne Matt, Alexander McEwen, James W. McKee, M. A. McLaughlin, Natasha McMann, Bradley W. Meyers, P. M. Meyers, Chiara M. F. Mingarelli, Andrea Mitridate, Priyamvada Natarajan, Cherry Ng, David J. Nice, Shania Nichols, Stella Koch Ocker, Ken D. Olum, Timothy T. Pennucci, Benetge B. P. Perera, Polina Petrov, Nihan S. Pol, H. A. Radovan, S. M. Ransom, Paul S. Ray, Joseph D. Romano, Jessie C. Runnoe, Alexander Saffer, Shashwat C. Sardesai, Ann Schmiedekamp, Carl Schmiedekamp, Kai Schmitz, Federico Semenzato, Brent J. Shapiro-Albert, Rohan Shivakumar, Xavier Siemens, Joseph Simon, Sophia V. Sosa Fiscella, I. H. Stairs, Daniel R. Stinebring, Kevin Stovall, Abhimanyu Susobhanan, Joseph K. Swiggum, Jacob Taylor, Stephen R. Taylor, Mercedes S. Thompson, Jacob E. Turner, Michele Vallisneri, Rutger van Haasteren, Sarah J. Vigeland, Haley M. Wahl, London E. Willson, K. Wilson, Caitlin A. Witt, David Wright, Olivia Young, K. Q. Zheng
11Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
0Institutions déclarées
0Pays d’affiliation déclarés
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract We present the first targeted searches for continuous gravitational waves (CWs) from 114 active galactic nuclei that may host supermassive black hole binaries, using the NANOGrav 15 yr dataset. By incorporating electromagnetic priors on sky location, distance, redshift, and CW frequency, our strain and chirp-mass upper limits are typically improved by a factor of ∼2 (median 2.2) relative to all-sky limits at the same frequency. Bayesian comparisons against a model including only a Hellings–Downs-correlated background disfavors a CW signal for all targets, with a mean Bayes factor of 0.73 ± 0.32. Two targets have Bayes factors slightly above unity, but coherence tests, random-targeting experiments, and a conservative accounting of the 114-target trials factor all indicate that they are consistent with noise. We use these two candidates as worked examples to illustrate an end-to-end targeted CW search analysis and a suite of follow-up tests that future promising candidates would need to pass. We find that the electromagnetic interpretations of both candidates are ambiguous, and we update the constraints on a putative binary in 3C 66B, ruling out part of its previously allowed parameter space. Ultimately, our results demonstrate the current sensitivity of targeted pulsar timing array searches for CWs and define a road map for future multimessenger CW detections.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- The NANOGrav 15 yr Dataset: Targeted Searches for Supermassive Black Hole Binaries
- Date Crossref
- 05/02/2026
- Éditeur
- American Astronomical Society
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les sujets associés
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves ResearchAstrophysical Phenomena and ObservationsGamma-ray bursts and supernovae