Evaluation of acute myeloid leukemia using genomic proximity mapping-based next generation cytogenomics
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Cytogenetic analysis encompasses a suite of standard-of-care diagnostic testing methods that is applied routinely in cases of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) to assess chromosomal changes that are clinically relevant for risk classification and treatment decisions. In this study, we assess the use of Genomic Proximity Mapping® (GPM) for cytogenomic analysis of AML diagnostic specimens for detection of cytogenetic risk variants included in the European Leukemia Network (ELN) risk stratification guidelines. Archival patients' samples (N=48) from the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center Leukemia Bank with historical clinical cytogenetic data were processed for GPM and analyzed with the CytoTerra cloud-based analysis platform. GPM showed 100% concordance for all specific variants that have associated impacts on risk stratification as defined by ELN 2022 criteria and 78% concordance when considering all variants reported by the Cytogenetics Laboratory at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center. Notably, the percentage of blasts (ranging from 5-96%) did not have a clear effect on the ability to detect these variants. In two cases, GPM identified a recurrent inv(9)(p13.3p13.1). These findings demonstrate GPM's effectiveness for the evaluation of known AML-associated risk variants and a source for biomarker discovery.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Evaluation of acute myeloid leukemia using genomic proximity mapping-based next generation cytogenomics
- Date Crossref
- 15/01/2026
- Éditeur
- Ferrata Storti Foundation (Haematologica)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.