Smartphone Application–Derived Clusters of Persistent Symptoms in Patients After Atrial Fibrillation Ablation
Rattachement africain : nl. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is characterized by a heterogeneous presentation of symptoms. AF ablation reduces symptom burden. However, persistent symptoms following AF ablation are common independently of AF recurrence. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to perform a cluster analysis to identify clinically relevant AF subphenotypes based on persistent symptoms following AF ablation and evaluate their associations with clinical characteristics and AF recurrence. METHODS: Patients were instructed to perform smartphone app-based simultaneous symptom and photoplethysmography heart rhythm monitoring 3 times daily for 1 week at the 3-month follow-up after AF ablation. A two-step cluster analysis including 7 categorical symptoms variables was performed in symptomatic patients. RESULTS: -VA score (P < 0.001), and left atrial volume index (P = 0.01) differed between clusters. CONCLUSIONS: Half of all patients report symptoms after AF ablation. Using cluster analysis, 5 symptom-based AF subphenotypes were identified, each with distinct clinical characteristics, biomarker profiles, AF recurrence, AF pattern, AF and symptom burden, and symptom-rhythm correlation. Symptom clusters empowered by digital health may facilitate individualized AF management strategies following AF ablation.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Smartphone Application–Derived Clusters of Persistent Symptoms in Patients After Atrial Fibrillation Ablation
- Date Crossref
- 01/04/2026
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.