Peer Review Report For: Scoping of Policy Impacts for Regulating E-cigarettes (SPIRE): findings from a data and decision analytic model mapping project [version 1; peer review: 2 approved, 1 not approved]
Rattachement africain : gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Background E-cigarettes, also known as vapes, are lower risk products compared to conventional cigarettes, that can aid smoking cessation. However, they have been developed to also appeal to people who do not smoke, and are not harm-free. The challenge is for vaping policy to support smokers to quit whilst also protecting non-smokers from starting. Simulation modelling can be used to synthesise existing evidence and make predictions about policy impacts. This research aims to identify (a) data sources that can inform modelling of vape policies in the United Kingdom (UK) and (b) gaps in data that are required to undertake appropriate modelling. Methods We held stakeholder workshops with academic experts, policy makers and public members to understand the requirements of a simulation model of vaping policy and existing data. Based on the findings of the first workshop and a review of existing modelling studies, we undertook a set of targeted rapid reviews to augment key existing reviews. We also developed a dataset dictionary. From these, we developed key recommendations about data collection and modelling. Results There is substantial UK evidence around many of the transitions between smoking and vaping behaviours, but these have not yet been estimated simultaneously. We also identified 25 UK studies assessing the socioeconomic, psychological and social network influences on vaping behaviours. However, there is limited evidence about the effectiveness of vaping policies in the UK, the impact of industry circumvention, the health harms of vaping for people who have never smoked, longer term evidence on the smoking harms of vaping and the use and impact of illegal vapes. Conclusions Addressing the identified gaps in the evidence will require targeted new research. By fostering collaboration across disciplines and ensuring transparency and consistency in modelling, the UK can build a credible, evidence-based foundation for shaping effective vape regulation.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Peer Review Report For: Scoping of Policy Impacts for Regulating E-cigarettes (SPIRE): findings from a data and decision analytic model mapping project [version 1; peer review: 2 approved, 1 not approved]
- Date Crossref
- 14/01/2026
- Éditeur
- National Institute for Health and Care Research
- Type
- peer-review
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
University of Sheffield pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
The Behaviouralist (United Kingdom) pays non établi dans la noticeEntreprise
-
University College London Behavioural Science and Health pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
University of Bath pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
University of Nottingham pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
King's College London pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
King's College School pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Imperial College London pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
University of Sheffield, The Behaviouralist (United Kingdom) et Behavioural Science and Health — University College London, avec 5 autres affiliations.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.