LncR12304.1-miR1507c- CsNADH-GOGAT ceRNA module regulates amino acid biosynthesis in tea plant ( Camellia sinensis )
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Glutamate synthase (GOGAT) is crucial for nitrogen metabolism and amino acid biosynthesis in tea plants, yet the post-transcriptional regulation of GOGAT remains unclear. This study identified miR1507c as a direct interactor of CsNADH-GOGAT, confirmed by DLR assays and 5′RLM-RACE. Notably in tobacco, the relative luciferase activity in plants overexpressing CsNADH-GOGAT and co-expressing miR1507c + CsNADH-GOGATm3 (mutant) were significantly higher than in those co-expressing miR1507c + CsNADH-GOGAT. Overexpression of miR1507c also significantly suppressed the expression of CsNADH-GOGAT and endogenous NtNADH-GOGAT homologs. Leveraging lncRNA sequencing, we screened lncR12304.1 as a ceRNA that regulates CsNADH-GOGAT by competitively binding to miR1507c. Cytoplasmic co-localization (validated by FISH) and direct interaction (confirmed by DLR assays) between lncR12304.1 and miR1507c were established. RNA pull down-qPCR further demonstrated miR1507c binding to both lncR12304.1 and CsNADH-GOGAT. The regulatory axis lncR12304.1–miR1507c–CsNADH-GOGAT was substantiated in vivo: (i) in tea roots/shoots under varying nitrogen treatments and following miR1507c suppression using Antagomir, and (ii) in tobacco via transient co-overexpression. Collectively, our results demonstrate the establishment of this ceRNA network and its role in regulating glutamate and theanine biosynthesis.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- LncR12304.1-miR1507c- <i>CsNADH-GOGAT</i> ceRNA module regulates amino acid biosynthesis in tea plant ( <i>Camellia sinensis</i> )
- Date Crossref
- 13/01/2026
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.