Unveiling the progenitor of SN 2023ixf: Circumstellar dust and its implications for the red supergiant problem
Résumé fourni par la source
The nearby Type II supernova SN 2023ixf offers a critical test of the long-standing ‘red supergiant problem’ – the apparent absence of high-mass red-supergiant progenitors in pre-explosion imaging. We present new late-time observations of SN 2023ixf: SiFAP2 photometry (714–772 d) with a custom supernova calibration, Swift -UVOT detections (788–801 d), and the one of the latest spectroscopic observations beyond 100 days (DOLoRES at 772 d). Combining these with archival data, we obtain two discrepant progenitor-mass estimates: light-curve modelling yields 5.5–14 M ⊙ , while nebular oxygen mass (∼2.3 M ⊙ ) and other spectroscopic diagnostics point to 17–19 M ⊙ . We reconcile this tension with a Bayesian Monte-Carlo framework that includes anisotropic circumstellar dust. Our analysis demonstrates that even a modest, clumpy circumstellar medium can produce sufficient extinction to bias luminosity-based masses downwards by ∼9 M ⊙ . Late-time photometry and spectroscopy further reveal clear signatures of shock interaction with circumstellar material (CSM) shells ejected centuries before explosion. SN 2023ixf thus provides direct evidence that circumstellar obscuration is a major contributor to the apparent lack of massive red-supergiant progenitors, underscoring the need for multi-method, multi-epoch observations for robust progenitor-mass determination.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Unveiling the progenitor of SN 2023ixf: Circumstellar dust and its implications for the red supergiant problem
- Date Crossref
- 01/02/2026
- Éditeur
- EDP Sciences
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.