Global solidarity in genomic surveillance improves early detection of acute respiratory virus threats
Résumé fourni par la source
As genomic surveillance is key to detecting novel respiratory viruses or variants, the highly unequal global distribution of respiratory virus sequencing infrastructure raises concerns about preparedness for future threats. Using mathematical models and global epidemic simulations, we demonstrate that attaining a global minimum sequencing capacity of two sequences per million people per week at fortnightly sequencing regularity could reduce the time to first detection of novel respiratory (variant) viruses by weeks to months compared to global sequencing efforts during the COVID-19 pandemic, even with a substantially reduced number of viruses sequenced globally. Establishing this minimum global capacity could increase the time between the virus’ first global detection and the first domestic case in all countries, universally improving prospects for mitigation of potential public health impacts. Importantly, these benefits cannot be attained by siloed expansion in countries that already possess strong capacity. Our results show that operationalizing global health solidarity is key to guiding investment in health security. Respiratory virus genomic surveillance output is unevenly distributed globally. Here, the authors show that addressing this imbalance could substantially reduce the time to first detection of novel (variant) viruses, enhancing surveillance effectiveness and efficiency.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Global solidarity in genomic surveillance improves early detection of acute respiratory virus threats
- Date Crossref
- 13/01/2026
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.