Comparative miRNA Expression Profiling Reveals Candidates Involved in Prostate Cancer Radioresistance
Rattachement africain : tr. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy among men worldwide, and treatment response depends on tumor radiosensitivity. Micrornas (mirnas) are key regulators of cell proliferation, apoptosis, and dna damage response, and have been implicated in therapy resistance. However, their roles in prostate cancer radioresponse remain incompletely understood. This study investigated the expression patterns of ten selected mirnas associated with radiation resistance in other cancers in prostate cancer models. Radiation-resistant pc-3, radiation-sensitive lncap, and normal prostate epithelial (hprec) cells were exposed to 0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 gy of ionizing radiation. Mirna expression levels were analyzed by quantitative pcr using snord48 as an internal control and calculated with the 2 - δδct method. In pc-3 cells, mir-20a-5p, mir-128-3p, and mir-135b-5p showed significant dose-dependent upregulation, whereas mir-23b-3p and mir-381-3p were downregulated. Mir-128-3p correlated positively with radiation dose, while mir-23b-3p and mir-381-3p showed negative correlations. Lncap cells exhibited moderate, non-dose-dependent mirna changes. Distinct mirna signatures differentiate radiation-resistant and radiation-sensitive prostate cancer cells. Mir-20a-5p, mir-128-3p, and mir-135b-5p may contribute to radioresistance, whereas mir-23b-3p and mir-381-3p may act as radiosensitizers.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- Comparative <scp>miRNA</scp> Expression Profiling Reveals Candidates Involved in Prostate Cancer Radioresistance
- Date Crossref
- 01/01/2026
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.