Complement C5 Inhibitor Ameliorates a Case of Dysferlinopathy
Rattachement africain : cn, ca, me. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVES: gene. Currently, no clinical effective treatment is available. Given the myopathologic and animal model evidence on complement activation in dysferlinopathy, we explored the potential therapeutic effect of complement inhibition. METHODS: We reported a case of teenager-onset dysferlinopathy with progressive proximal weakness, markedly elevated serum creatine kinase levels, and assistance requirement for ambulation when admission. Muscle biopsy showed dysferlin deficiency and marked deposition of complement C5b-9 on nonnecrotic sarcolemma. Based on these findings and previous preclinical studies, the patient received eculizumab (900 mg weekly for 4 weeks) with informed consent. RESULTS: Clinical improvement was observed following complement inhibition therapy. By week 5, all tested muscle groups reached Medical Research Council grade 5/5, and the North Star Assessment for Dysferlinopathy score increased from 28 to 39. The 6-minute walk test (6MWT) improved from 220 m to 363 m. The muscle MRI revealed reduced muscle edema after eculizumab treatment. These benefits were sustained at 13-month follow-up. DISCUSSION: Complement inhibition showed promising clinical improvement in this single case of dysferlinopathy. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to investigate the efficacy and safety of complement inhibitors in dysferlinopathy.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Complement C5 Inhibitor Ameliorates a Case of Dysferlinopathy
- Date Crossref
- 01/03/2026
- Éditeur
- Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.