Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

P-795. Comparison of Clinical Outcomes after Treatment of Urinary Tract Infections Caused by Serratia marcescens, Morganella morganii, and Providencia spp. with Antibiotics Susceptible to versus Stable against AmpC Hydrolysis

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
4Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us, gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Background The 2024 IDSA Guidance on the Treatment of Antimicrobial-Resistant Gram-Negative Infections suggests selecting antibiotics according to susceptibility results to treat infections caused by S. marcescens, M. morganii, and Providencia spp. Although these organisms are thought to be at moderate to low risk of developing clinically significant AmpC expression, use of broad-spectrum beta-lactam antibiotics remains common even for urinary tract infections (UTIs). No study to date has compared the clinical outcomes for UTIs caused by these organisms in patients who initially received antibiotics susceptible to AmpC hydrolysis to those treated with AmpC-stable antibiotics.Table 1.Baseline CharacteristicsTable 2.Primary and Secondary Outcomes Methods This was a single-center retrospective study of non-pregnant patients > 18 years old with S. marcescens, M. morganii, or Providencia spp. isolated from a urine culture who received treatment with active antibiotics for at least 48 hours from October 2019 to June 2024. Patients with antibiotic use for other indications, polymicrobial urine cultures warranting broader antibiotic coverage, or isolates resistant to ceftriaxone were excluded. The primary outcome was recurrence of infection – defined as re-isolation of the same organism in a urine culture within 28 days of treatment. Results 112 unique patients met the inclusion criteria, Patients were divided into two cohorts—Group 1 consisted of 79 patients (70.5%) who received ceftriaxone (CRO), cefpodoxime (CPD), or piperacillin/tazobactam (TZP), and Group 2 had 33 patients (29.5%) receiving cefepime (FEP), meropenem (MEM), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (SXT), or a fluoroquinolone (FQ). 90 patients (80.36%) met IDSA criteria for complicated UTI (Table 1). The primary outcome occurred in 2 patients (2.53%) in Group 1 and 3 patients (3.8%) in Group 2. The same organism was reisolated within a year of treatment in 5 patients from Group 1 and 4 patients from Group 2 – all of which had unchanged susceptibility patterns (Table 2). Conclusion In this population of patients with UTI caused by organisms with low risk of AmpC expression, the observed rate of UTI recurrence was similar after initial treatment with antibiotics susceptible to AmpC hydrolysis compared to antibiotics stable against AmpC hydrolysis. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
P-795. Comparison of Clinical Outcomes after Treatment of Urinary Tract Infections Caused by Serratia marcescens, Morganella morganii, and Providencia spp. with Antibiotics Susceptible to versus Stable against AmpC Hydrolysis
Date Crossref
01/01/2026
Éditeur
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Urinary Tract Infections ManagementReproductive tract infections researchAntibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.