Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 review

P-613. Impact of Maternal Tdap Booster Vaccination During Pregnancy on Pertussis Incidence, Vaccine Effectiveness, Hospitalization, and Mortality in Newborns and Infants: A Systematic Literature Review

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
3Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : de, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Background Pertussis remains a significant public health concern, particularly for newborns and infants who are at a high risk of severe disease and mortality. Many countries have updated their national immunization schedules to include maternal booster vaccination to confer passive immunity to infants. This literature review aimed to evaluate the impact of maternal tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis (Tdap) booster vaccination on the protection of newborns and infants.Table 1.Characteristics of Studies on Maternal Pertussis Booster Vaccination Identified through Systematic Literature ReviewTable 2.Summary of key outcomes from studies included in the Systematic Literature Review on pertussis vaccination during pregnancy stratified by comparator group Methods A systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases from inception to January 24, 2024. Studies comparing the effects of prenatal pertussis vaccination to no prenatal or postpartum vaccinations, were included. Data were extracted on various outcomes, including vaccine effectiveness (VE), risk of severe disease, risk of intubation, mortality, hospitalization rates, incidence rates and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Articles in English and German were included. Results A total of 37 studies (38 publications) conducted in various geographic locations were included (Table 1). VE of prenatal Tdap booster was highest when vaccination occurred ≥1 week before birth (69.0% to 91.4%; n=4 studies) versus ≤1 week before birth or postpartum (4.9% to 45.7%, n=4 studies) (Table 2). Two studies comparing prenatal with no prenatal vaccination reported 0% and 1.6% infant mortality in the prenatal and no-prenatal Tdap groups, respectively. Infant mortality and pertussis incidence rates decreased among infants after the introduction of prenatal immunization (Table 2). Prenatal Tdap vaccination reduced the risk of severe disease and intubation in infants aged 0 to 2 months and was associated with lower rates of hospitalization and ICU admission compared to no prenatal vaccination (Table 2). Conclusion Our findings highlight the potential of Tdap boosters during pregnancy to enhance maternal immunization strategies, leading to significant decreases in pertussis incidence, severity, and mortality rates in infants. Disclosures Christian Rauschert, PhD, GlaxoSmithKline GmbH & Co. KG: Employee Abda Mahmood, PhD, GSK: Employee Andreas Freitag, Medical Doctor, Cytel: Employed by Cytel at the time of the research|Roche Products Ltd: Employed by Roche Products Ltd - No financial interest in the work conducted/presented Daniel Heinze, PhD, GlaxoSmithKline: Employee|GlaxoSmithKline: Stocks/Bonds (Public Company)|Sanofi-Aventis: Stocks/Bonds (Public Company) Liu Zhang, n/a, Cytel: Advisor/Consultant Nishant Mehra, n/a, Cytel / GSK: Employed by Cytel - Cytel received research funding form GSK Pavo Marijic, PhD, GSK: employee|GSK: Stocks/Bonds (Public Company) Alexander Heiseke, PhD, GlaxoSmithKline GmbH & Co. KG: Employee|GlaxoSmithKline GmbH & Co. KG: Stocks/Bonds (Private Company) Pavitra Dewda, MBBS, MD, GSK: Employee|GSK: Stocks/Bonds (Private Company)

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
P-613. Impact of Maternal Tdap Booster Vaccination During Pregnancy on Pertussis Incidence, Vaccine Effectiveness, Hospitalization, and Mortality in Newborns and Infants: A Systematic Literature Review
Date Crossref
01/01/2026
Éditeur
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Bacterial Infections and VaccinesDiphtheria, Corynebacterium, and TetanusNeonatal and Maternal Infections

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.