Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

149. Determining the Feasibility of a Rapid Test in Detecting the Presence of the Cefazolin Inoculum Effect (CzIE) in Methicillin Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA)

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
6Institutions déclarées
3Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us, co, au. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Background Infections with S. aureus continue to be a significant clinical burden. While cefazolin (CFZ), a first-generation cephalosporin, remains a key therapy against MSSA bloodstream infections (BSIs), some studies have suggested poor outcomes when CFZ is used in the presence of the cefazolin inoculum effect (CzIE). However, broth microdilution at standard and high inoculum, the gold standard test for detection of CzIE, is impractical for clinical microbiology labs. In this study, we evaluated the feasibility of rapid colorimetric testing using nitrocefin (NCF) to identify the CzIE in real-time in a clinical microbiology lab.CzIE by MICsRapid test results stratified by MICs when comparing real time performance in the micro lab versus the controlled environment of a research lab. Methods Eighty-eight MSSA isolates were recovered from initial cultures of adult patients between January 2025 and April 2025 at the central lab of an urban hospital system. The NCF-based rapid test was performed in the clinical microbiology lab in real-time according to a published protocol. In the research lab, the CzIE was then assessed using broth microdilution (BMD) at standard (105) and high (107) inocula, with a cutoff CFZ MIC ≥ 16 μg/ml. The NCF-based test was repeated at the research lab under controlled conditions. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and concordance rates were calculated. Results Thirty-three (37.5%) of the 88 isolates were positive for the CzIE by the BMD method. Using the NCF rapid test, 33/88 (37.5%) isolates were determined to be positive for the CzIE in the microbiology lab, compared to 36/88 (40.9%) in the research lab. The overall accuracy of the real time rapid test performed in the micro lab was 86.4% (76/88) with a specificity of 89.1% (49/55) and a sensitivity of 81.8% (27/33). When the rapid test was performed in a controlled environment, it had an overall accuracy of 85.2% (75/88) with a specificity of 85.5% (47/55) and a sensitivity of 84.8% (28/33). The rapid tests were in substantial agreement between the two labs with a kappa of 0.74 and a concordance rate of 87.5%. Conclusion Real-time performance of the NCF-based rapid test was comparable to controlled research conditions, supporting its feasibility for integration into routine microbiology laboratory workflows. Further validation is needed to confirm these results and to clarify the clinical significance of early detection of CzIE in MSSA. Disclosures Jose M. Munita, MD, MSD LATAM: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer, Inc.: Grant/Research Support Cesar A. Arias, MD/PhD, UptoDate: Royalties

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
149. Determining the Feasibility of a Rapid Test in Detecting the Presence of the Cefazolin Inoculum Effect (CzIE) in Methicillin Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA)
Date Crossref
01/01/2026
Éditeur
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility TestingAntimicrobial Resistance in StaphylococcusAntibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.